Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nicolas Duminil's avatar

Thanks for sharing Markus. While this "Java first" approach presented as "Option 1" is sometimes useful, for rapid prototyping and POCs, the professional practice requires, more often than not, the "Option 2", i.e. a "WSDL-first" approach. As you're explaining, SOAP services are represented, enterprise wide, as WSDL documents, containing XSDs of several hundreds lines, with complicated namespaces, etc. This is why, in my opinion, an "Option 2" implementation, would be more realistic. Especially if it addresses the case of WSDL imports, including shared schemas, etc.

But thank you anyway for popularizing this forgotten technology that only SOA people like me still remember :-)

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts